What a Claim Has to Show: Potential Legal Theories After a Trampoline Concussion
Three legal theories come up most often after a trampoline concussion, and more than one can apply to the same incident.
Premises liability is the legal duty a property owner or operator owes to people on the property to keep conditions reasonably safe. It can reach a trampoline park operator and, in a backyard case, a homeowner. Negligent supervision is a failure to oversee an activity with reasonable care: not enforcing safety rules, allowing too many jumpers on a court at once, or not monitoring the activity adequately. Both are forms of negligence, and a negligence claim generally has to show four elements: a duty, a breach of that duty, causation linking the breach to the injury, and damages.
Product liability is a claim that a defect in the trampoline or one of its parts, in its design, its manufacture or its warnings, caused the injury. It generally asks whether there was a defect and whether the defect caused the harm. Federal consumer-safety law offers a useful picture of what "defect" means. A Consumer Product Safety Commission regulation, 16 C.F.R. § 1115.4, written for companies deciding whether to report a product, says "a defect is a fault, flaw, or irregularity that causes weakness, failure, or inadequacy in form or function," and that a defect "can also occur in a product's contents, construction, finish, packaging, warnings, and/or instructions." Under 15 U.S.C. § 2064, manufacturers, distributors and retailers that obtain information reasonably supporting the conclusion that a product has such a defect, or creates an unreasonable risk of serious injury or death, generally must inform the Commission, which may order remedies such as public notice, repair, replacement or refund. A recall or report, though, is not a finding that a product injured any particular person, and an injury does not prove a defect.
Two more issues often shape these cases. A waiver or release is a document some parks ask participants to sign before jumping, usually giving up certain claims. Its enforceability differs by state, and courts have treated a parent's signature for a child differently from an adult signing for themselves; the site's page on trampoline park waivers covers that in depth. Comparative fault is a rule under which some states reduce, or in some cases bar, recovery if the injured person was partly at fault. The rules differ by state.
Whether any of these elements is met depends on the facts of the specific incident and the law of the state where it happened. The site's page on a trampoline park injury claim walks through the park setting in more detail.